Skip to main content

Week 4-- Perspectives on Privacy


Image result for online privacy
This week we read chapter 4 of Boyd (2014) It’s Complicated. An aspect that I found particularly interesting was the exploration of what privacy is and how individuals can have a different definition of privacy and strategies to maintain their desired level. We live in an age that information is more public by default than private by default. (Boyd, 62). I found this chapter particularly interesting because it offered perspectives different than my own. It shed some light onto some ideas that some of my students share. The issue of privacy is especially important when working with students who are extremely vulnerable both on and offline. It feels impossible to fully and properly equip students to face all the possible dangers of the internet and other personal technology (yes, that sentence was the dark side talking).

I think the first thing to note is that it is important to be informed and be able to look at concepts like privacy with different perspectives. While adults often would say that teens share too much irrelevant information online, Boyd says that teens think it is easier for them to overshare details that do not matter to the general population and that their audience will just filter out anything that does not pertain to them. Boyd talks to a 17 year old girl named Alicia who believes privacy is “choosing what you want to keep to yourself” rather than Merriam Webster’s definition, which says that it is the “quality or state of being apart from company or observation.” Alicia does not see herself as giving up privacy when she posts to a broad audience. She maintains privacy by choosing what to share.

Another point that I found interesting was the idea that teens found it intrusive if their parents were looking at what they post publicly (not snooping, as that is an entirely different situation in my opinion). Drexler (2013) reports that, “nearly half of all parents using Facebook joined the social network with the primary purpose of spying on their kids (and their kids' friends). All but 7 percent of those parents check their child's profile every single day, monitoring status updates, location check-ins and photos their kids post and are tagged in.” It goes to show how perspectives vary and the importance of being able to try to look from different perspectives and have productive conversations about technology. Simply following your child on their various social media is not an effective way to keep them safe, rather, being able to have open and honest dialogue about some of the big concepts like citizenship and safety which inevitably cover a wide range of concerns.






When we are back in school, I am going to try to gain a deeper understanding of where my students are coming from on an individual level (specifically my higher needs kids on my caseload that I see the most often). I am curious about their need to publicize seemingly private aspects of their lives. I think a lot could be learned from figuring out what their why is for doing some of these things rather than just acknowledging that they have some concerning habits/routines and teaching against those without delving into the underlying motives, or the function of the behaviour. Again, I think these issues can be explored through conversations and activities, but my goal is to go deeper and do work that is not a band aid solution.


References

Boyd, D. (2014). It's Complicated: the social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press


Drexler, P. (2013, December 06). Why Teens Need Privacy Online The case against monitoring teens online. Psychology Today. Retrieved July 27, 2018, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/our-gender-ourselves/201312/why-teens-need-privacy-online

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1-- Dark and Light

This week we began discussing the dark and light sides of technology. There are things I like about living in a technology saturated society, there are also aspects that I don’t like and am weary of; however, I have never really considered the dark/light perspective. It prompted me to think about how I represent technology in my day to day teaching. As we are just embarking on this journey, I thought I would reflect on where I am on each side in my teaching practice. Let’s start with the dark side… What happens on social media outside of school significantly impacted how our class time would go this year. I had a small group that I saw daily and much of what we ended up spending our discussion time on was problem solving things that had happened somehow through social media. While I don’t mind doing this and part of my job is to help my students navigate the unwritten rules around them, it took away from a lot of other things that were just as valuable and it never felt like we were ...

Week 2-- Netiquette that Applies Across Settings

I was surprised by the relevance of Virginia Shea’s Netiquette rules that we read about this week. They were all still applicable, but the first two stuck out to me the most. This got me thinking about how I approach my role. I aim to take a holistic approach. A large part of my job is knowing my students as individuals and working with a team to create and implement programming in the best interest of a student. The following two netiquette rules stuck out to me the most, as they are areas on a broader scale that are especially important for my students and are applicable in more than netiquette, but across settings.         1. Remember the Human         2. Adhere to the same standards of behaviour (Shea, 1994) As much as it may seem that these should be common sense, I have seen many discussion forums and online comments that show that it may not be! Many of my students have difficulties understanding and creating boundaries in general. Having...